Blueprint v2.3: AI-isms filter, Deep POV mandate, genre-specific writing rules

- story/style_persona.py: Expanded default ai_isms list with 20+ modern AI phrases
  (delved, mined, neon-lit, bustling, a wave of, etched in, etc.) and added
  filter_words (wondered, seemed, appeared, watched, observed, sensed)
- story/editor.py: Stricter evaluate_chapter_quality rubric — added
  DEEP_POV_ENFORCEMENT block with automatic fail conditions for filter word
  density and summary mode; strengthened criterion 5 scoring thresholds
- story/writer.py: Added get_genre_instructions() helper with genre-specific
  mandates for Thriller, Romance, Fantasy, Sci-Fi, Horror, Historical, and
  General Fiction; added DEEP_POV_MANDATE block banning summary mode and
  filter words; expanded AVOID AI-ISMS banned phrase list

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

story/editor.py

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ def evaluate_chapter_quality(text, chapter_title, genre, model, folder):
 
     prompt = f"""
     ROLE: Senior Literary Editor
-    TASK: Critique chapter draft.
+    TASK: Critique chapter draft. Apply STRICT scoring — do not inflate scores.
 
     METADATA:
     - TITLE: {chapter_title}
@@ -25,16 +25,21 @@ def evaluate_chapter_quality(text, chapter_title, genre, model, folder):
 
     PROHIBITED_PATTERNS:
     - AI_ISMS: {ai_isms}
-    - FILTER_WORDS: {fw_examples}
+    - FILTER_WORDS: {fw_examples} — these are telling words that distance the reader from the scene.
     - CLICHES: White Room, As You Know Bob, Summary Mode, Anachronisms.
     - SYNTAX: Repetitive structure, Passive Voice, Adverb Reliance.
 
+    DEEP_POV_ENFORCEMENT (AUTOMATIC FAIL CONDITIONS):
+    - FILTER_WORD_DENSITY: Scan the entire text for filter words (felt, saw, heard, realized, decided, noticed, knew, thought, wondered, seemed, appeared, watched, observed, sensed). If these words appear more than once per 120 words on average, criterion 5 MUST score 1-4 and the overall score CANNOT exceed 5.
+    - SUMMARY_MODE: If any passage narrates events in summary rather than dramatizing them in real-time scene (e.g., "Over the next hour, they discussed...", "He had spent years..."), flag it. Summary mode in a scene that should be dramatized drops criterion 2 to 1-3 and the overall score CANNOT exceed 6.
+    - TELLING_EMOTIONS: Phrases like "She felt sad," "He was angry," "She was nervous" — labeling emotions instead of showing them through physical action — are automatic criterion 5 failures. Each instance must be called out.
+
     QUALITY_RUBRIC (1-10):
     1. ENGAGEMENT & TENSION: Does the story grip the reader from the first line? Is there conflict or tension in every scene?
-    2. SCENE EXECUTION: Is the middle of the chapter fully fleshed out? Does it avoid "sagging" or summarizing key moments?
+    2. SCENE EXECUTION: Is the middle of the chapter fully fleshed out? Does it avoid "sagging" or summarizing key moments? (Automatic 1-3 if summary mode detected.)
     3. VOICE & TONE: Is the narrative voice distinct? Does it match the genre?
     4. SENSORY IMMERSION: Does the text use sensory details effectively without being overwhelming?
-    5. SHOW, DON'T TELL: Are emotions shown through physical reactions and subtext?
+    5. SHOW, DON'T TELL / DEEP POV: STRICT ENFORCEMENT. Emotions must be rendered through physical reactions, micro-behaviours, and subtext — NOT named or labelled. Score 1-4 if filter word density is high. Score 1-2 if the chapter names emotions directly ("she felt," "he was angry") more than 3 times. Score 7-10 ONLY if the reader experiences the POV character's state without being told what it is.
     6. CHARACTER AGENCY: Do characters drive the plot through active choices?
     7. PACING: Does the chapter feel rushed? Does the ending land with impact, or does it cut off too abruptly?
     8. GENRE APPROPRIATENESS: Are introductions of characters, places, items, or actions consistent with the {genre} conventions?
@@ -49,7 +54,8 @@ def evaluate_chapter_quality(text, chapter_title, genre, model, folder):
     - 9 (Bestseller): Exceptional quality, minor style tweaks only.
     - 7-8 (Professional): Good draft, solid structure, needs editing.
     - 6 (Passable): Average, has issues with pacing or voice. Needs heavy refinement.
-    - 1-5 (Fail): Structural flaws, boring, or incoherent. Needs rewrite.
+    - 1-5 (Fail): Structural flaws, summary mode detected, heavy filter word reliance, or incoherent. Needs full rewrite.
+    - IMPORTANT: A score of 7+ CANNOT be awarded if filter word density is high or if any emotion is directly named/labelled.
 
     OUTPUT_FORMAT (JSON):
     {{